In This Section |
Poultry: Is Feed Efficiency Still a Useful Measure of Broiler Performance?
Table of Contents
|
| Diet ME (kcal/kg) |
Diet CP (%) |
49d body wt (g) |
Feed intake 35-49d (g) |
Feed:gain 35-49d |
Energy efficiency (Mcal/kg gain) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
3200
|
18
|
2950
|
2580
|
2.34
|
7.43
|
|
2900
|
16
|
2920
|
2760
|
2.49
|
7.19
|
|
2600
|
14
|
2880
|
2900
|
2.72
|
6.97
|
|
2300
|
13
|
2910
|
3270
|
2.99
|
6.70
|
|
1900
|
11
|
2910
|
3670
|
3.31
|
6.37
|
|
1600
|
9
|
2890
|
4300
|
4.01
|
6.41
|
As the nutrient level of the diet was reduced, so birds ate more feed.
This means that the bird is not eating to physical capacity, because
the bird was able to almost double its normal intake on the very low
nutrient dense diet. This amazing ability to adjust feed intake resulted
in no real difference in 49d body weight. As the birds eat more feed
at constant growth rate, then feed efficiency starts to deteriorate.
A feed efficiency of 4.01 from 35-49d would hardly seem to be economical.
However, if we calculate energy efficiency, then the birds on the
lowest energy feed were actually the most efficient in converting
feed energy to weight gain. This is a good example of classical measures
of feed efficiency being totally misleading. It is unlikely that the
low energy levels used in Table 1 would be economical, because it
is difficult to find low energy ingredients that are inexpensive per
unit of energy. However these data do show that we can consider a
range of energy levels for the broiler, without affecting growth rate
too much, and so diet choice is simply a matter of allowing our formulation
programs to select the most optimum solution.
| Top of Page |
The feed efficiency of female broilers will usually be higher (less
efficient) than male birds of corresponding weight, after about 30
days of age. The reason for this is that female birds tend to deposit
proportionally more fat in the carcass. Body fat takes 9 times as
much feed energy to produce as does muscle. The reasons for this is
that fat contains more energy than does protein per unit of weight,
and more importantly, muscle is only about 20% protein by weight,
the remainder being water. For this reason it is usually uneconomical
to grow female broilers much beyond 45d unless special emphasis is
placed on reducing fat deposition . Likewise with heavy male birds,
feed efficiency is going to be greatly influenced by the growth of
fat vs muscle.
As birds get older, their feed efficiency will deteriorate. This situation is simply due to the fact that heavy birds use increasing quantities of feed to maintain their body mass, and less is used for growth. In the 7d old bird, about 80% of feed is directed to growth and only 20% is needed to maintain the small body size - consequently feed is used very efficiently. In an 8-week old bird these numbers are reversed such that only 20% of feed is used for growth, and 80% is needed to maintain the ever-increasing body mass - feed efficiency, therefore, deteriorates.
| Top of Page |
The broilers' maintenance needs are greatly influenced by the temperature
of its environments. After initial brooding, the bird must use some
of its feed to maintain its body temperature. Under ideal conditions
of around 20-25 degrees Celsius, the bird uses a minimum of feed to
maintain body temperature. In cooler conditions, more diet energy
must be used to maintain body heat, (and so less feed is used for
growth) and consequently feed efficiency will deteriorate. Feed intake
will increase by about 1% for each 1 degrees Celsius below 20 degrees
Celsius. Between 20-25 degrees Celsius, the bird will eat about 1%
less per 1 degrees Celsius increase in temperature, and so here feed
efficiency will improve. Above 25 degrees Celsius (depending upon
acclimatization), heat stress conditions can occur, and here feed
efficiency will again deteriorate because now the bird is using energy
to stay cool (panting, etc.). Under these conditions, efficiency of
feed further deteriorates because the bird is reluctant to eat feed,
and so proportionally more feed is directed towards maintenance, and
less can be used for growth.
Obviously an unhealthy bird is likely to have poor feed efficiency. The main reason for this is that feed intake is reduced, and so again proportionally more feed is directed towards maintenance. With enteric diseases there can be more subtle changes in feed utilization because various parasites and microbes can reduce the efficiency of digestion and absorption of nutrients. A bird with sub-clinical coccidiosis is not likely to absorb nutrients with optimum efficiency, because the oocytes will destroy some of the cells lining the gut. More recently the phenomena of so-called "feed passage" has been observed in broilers. Undigested feed particles are seen in the excreta, and so consequently feed efficiency will be affected. The exact cause of this problem is unknown, but is most likely the consequences of microbial challenge.
The previous discussion suggests that feed efficiency is a moving target, and today striving for a low numerical value for feed efficiency may not always be the most economical situation. A much more useful measure will be feed cost/kg weight gain, or some further variation of this such as cost/kg deboned meat, etc. A very useful starting point in re-evaluating efficiency of feed use is to consider conversion of feed energy to liveweight gain. Following are typical energy conversion figures for broilers up to 9 weeks of age (Table 2).
|
Weeks
of age |
Male birds
|
Female birds
|
Mixed sex
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
4
|
-
|
5.15
|
-
|
|
5
|
5.35
|
5.60
|
5.48
|
|
6
|
5.75
|
6.05
|
5.90
|
|
7
|
6.20
|
6.60
|
6.40
|
|
8
|
6.65
|
-
|
-
|
|
9
|
7.10
|
-
|
-
|
Feed efficiency of broilers is affected by bird age, sex, health and environmental temperature, although the major factor is usually diet energy concentration. With a very wide range of diet energy concentrations used worldwide today, classical measures of feed intake:weight gain (or weight gain:feed intake) become less meaningful. The "lowest" feed efficiency may not always be the most economical, because economics may dictate the optimum use of low rather than high diet energy levels. A more useful measure of feed usage is energy intake per unit of weight gain. For male birds the goals are for 6.2 Mcals metabolizable energy per kg weight gain for 6 week-old birds.
| Top of Page |
For more information:
This site is maintained
by the Government of Ontario
Queen's
Printer for Ontario
Last Modified: