|
|
Feeding Systems for Sheep
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Rules of Thumb
- Planning a System
- Choosing a Feeding/Mixing System
- Diet Supplementation for Ewes Grazing Pasture
- Conclusion
- Table 1
- Table 2
- Table 3
Introduction
Choosing a feeding system requires several considerations:
labour efficiency, animal diets and such other animal factors as bunk
space, number of head to be fed, as well as mechanical assets and needs.
Rules of Thumb
- Forage feeding will be a bottleneck. It forms the bulk of the diet
by volume, weight and feeding time. Efficient delivery of the forage
component should be a primary goal.
- One person should be able to feed forage in a system with no additional
help.
- Walk-though or drive-through feeders are the most time and labour
efficient.
- Feeding time (forage only) should be no more than 8 sec. per
ewe. This is the time from storage to delivery completion. This means
it takes 800 sec. or 13 min., 20 sec. to feed 100 ewes.
- Deliver concentrates even more quickly than forages. Target for 1
sec./ewe or less of actual feeding time, and allow an extra few seconds
per animal staging time (e.g. the time to fill carts or pails used in
feeding).
- Dry ewes (maintenance) are animals that require proportionately very
little time (feeding and management).
- Employ safe feeding practices. Avoid any feeding system that requires
the animals be underfoot or in contact with machinery during forage
or concentrate delivery. Such systems increase risk to shepherd and
sheep, as well as reduced efficiency. See Table 1,
Space Allowances and Bunk Space Requirements for Sheep, for
proper space allowances per sheep to ensure intake and safety.
Planning a System
Simulate one year's feeding needs. Include all rations
that might be fed. See Table 2, Sheep Rations
Commonly Fed Over a Production Year and Their Commodity Components
for a sample plan. Your first decision is what format to use feed
forage. Will it be bales or bulk? Silage or dry hay? Assuming bales, are
they big or small, round or square? This affects feeder choices and designs,
as well as the method of delivery. Forage is assumed to be the cornerstone
of the diet, except for lamb rations.
Some common ration and concentrate permutations are given
in Table 3, Commodity Options by Concentrate
Feeding System. Several variations of feedstuffs are named
for each ration to allow you to determine feed and equipment needs. This
factsheet assumes an accelerated breeding and lambing system using prolific
ewes. The production system allows for confinement or outdoor housing
of the flock.
- Molasses is recommended in lamb rations to promote intake. Wet molasses
is preferred, but dry molasses will suffice.
- Supplemental minerals are required in each ration. You can make it
available either as free-choice, or in the supplement pellet or in the
ration as a premix. If used as a premix, it will separate with the fines,
and is not suitable for any feeding system other than bunks/mangers,
unless a binding agent is used (e.g. molasses).
- The range of crude protein (CP) and total digestible nutrients (TDN)
values for the pasture supplementation scheme is a reflection of pasture
variability. Understand the forage quality of each pasture being consumed
by the sheep.
- Corn vs. Small Grains: In many cases cost determines which grain to
use. In general, corn is lower in protein and higher in energy (9% CP
and 90% TDN) than barley (12% CP and 82% TDN) and oats (11% CP and 73%
TDN). The combination of grain economics and pasture quality affects
which grains to use for pasture supplementation, and may cause any one
ingredient to be removed from the mixture.
- Quantities of ration ingredients can only be determined with information
on the nutrient content of the forage component of the ration.
Table 3 is a listing of the various
options available to achieve the recommended crude protein and energy
content of supplements for various classes of lambs and sheep. Formulate
an appropriate ration to ensure its suitability for a given class of animals.
Choosing a Feeding/Mixing System
At a certain farm size, many producers consider mixing their own feed.
Consider the following points in deciding whether mixing feed on-farm
is economical.
-
Calculate the cost of a farm-made diet for the permutations planned.
Establish the cost of the commercial alternative. Subtract the two
to determine the differential.
-
If the differential indicates home mixing may be economical, estimate
the tonnage you would mix per year. The more the better, so using
the farm mill for many different livestock groups is beneficial.
-
Calculate the equipment required above and beyond what is needed
for purchased, complete feeds: commodity storage bins, augers, complete
diet bins, feed carts plus the mill. Some of the systems to be considered:
-
Total Mixed Ration (TMR) - silages, hay and grain fed at once.
Stationary and mobile mixers available. TMR mixers work in a batch-mixing
manner. They require specialized feeding arrangements (drive-through
feeders for mobile units, conveyor belts or wagons for stationary
units). Daily time requirement includes loading, mixing and dispensing.
-
Tractor Drawn Mix-mills - are large batch mixers, which can process
dry hay by grinding into concentrate rations. They are run off
power-take-off (PTO) power, and have their own dispensing auger.
These allow bins to be filled at one or more locations. Daily
time requirement includes loading, mixing and dispensing.
-
Stationary Volumetric Mills - use feed proportioners; feed ingredients
are stored in overhead bins and flow by gravity into separate
compartments located on top of a stationary mill. They produce
a steady flow of the desired ration by controlled ingredient flow
rate, but require calibration upon receiving a new commodity.
Furthermore, they can only be used for concentrate diets. Daily
time requirement includes bin level checks, timer setting and
dispensing.
-
Blending boxes - use the same stationary principle as the Stationary
Volumetric Mills but have no motorized parts. They are based on
flow rates through slides; are probably less accurate; have no
potential for rolling or grinding, and also lack self-contained
augers. Daily time requirement includes bin level checks, supervised
mixing and dispensing.
-
Decide on an appropriate amortization period for the extra equipment.
It should reflect the lifetime of the machinery (5-10 years).
-
Does the differential multiplied by the tonnage over the amortization
period cover the entire farm mixing related cost? Remember to factor
in your additional labour costs.
Diet Supplementation for Ewes Grazing Pasture
Many producers use lightweight mangers located in the pasture area and
deliver feed to the manger in pails or bags. Although this particular
strategy may work for a small group of animals, the labour and physical
risk to the shepherd usually hinders the success and life span of this
practice in larger animal groups. An often overlooked fact is that sheep,
because of their mouth structure, can retrieve feed particles from within
the pasture sward. Provided the feed is delivered on a clean surface (clean
grass, sod or snow) and the grains are whole or pelleted, ewes will very
quickly and effectively learn how to thoroughly clean up the feed mixture.
Refer to OMAF Factsheet Diet Supplementation for Grazing and Outwintering
Ewes, Order No. 02-045.
Conclusion
In choosing a feeding system, several factors need to be considered.
Most importantly are labour efficiency, safety and cost. Using a feeding
or supplementation system that is fast, effective and safe will ensure
the proper feed is delivered at the proper time. This in turn will improve
animal performance and flock success.
Table 1.
Space Allowances and Bunk Space Requirements for Sheep
|
Accommodation
|
Ewes and Rams
|
Feeder Lambs
|
|
Feedlot
|
hard surfaced
|
15 sq. ft. per head |
6 sq. ft. per head |
|
soil*
|
70 sq. ft. per head
|
30 sq. ft. per head
|
|
Open front shed
|
floor area
|
15 sq. ft. per pregnant ewe
10 sq. ft. per dry ewe |
6 sq. ft. per head |
|
ceiling height
|
9 ft. minimum
|
9 ft. minimum
|
|
Slotted floors**
|
area per animal
|
7 sq. ft. |
4 sq. ft. |
|
% slotted floor area
|
100 |
100 |
|
slot width
|
3/4 inch |
5/8 inch |
|
slat width
|
2 to 3 inches
|
2 to 3 inches
|
|
Lambing pens
(not slotted)
|
claiming pen only
|
4 x 4 ft. minimum |
|
|
lambing and claiming pen
|
4 x 5 ft. minimum
|
|
|
Feed rack
|
length per head
|
16 inches group feeding |
12 inches group feeding |
| 6 inches self-fed |
4 inches self-fed |
|
height at throat
|
12 inches small breeds |
10 inches small breeds |
|
15 inches large breeds
|
12 inches large breeds
|
|
Feed storage
|
hay
|
3 lb./head/day (small breeds) |
2 lb./head/day |
| 5 lb./head/day (large breeds) |
2 lb./head/day |
|
grain
|
1/3 lb./head/day
|
1/2 lb./head/day (maintenance)
1 to 2 1/2 lb./head/day (finishing)
|
|
Bedding storage
|
3/4 lb./head/day
|
1/4 lb./head/day
|
|
Water
|
surface area
|
1 sq. ft./40 head
|
1 sq. ft./40 head
|
*Use soil surfaced feedlots only where annual precipitation is less than
20 in. With soil surface, provide a paved feeding strip adjacent to each
feed bunk. This paved strip should be at least 6 ft wide, or as wide as
the tractor used for cleaning, and the strip should slope at 1/2 in./ft
away from the feed bunk.
** An alternative to slotted floors, for ewes, rams or lambs is 1
by 2 in 10-gauge expanded and flattened metal mesh. Expanded metal mesh
floors may be covered with a solid panel to retain bedding for lambing.
Source: Adapted from Canada Plan Service, Sheep Housing and Equipment,
Plan M-4000.
Table 2.
Sheep Rations Commonly Fed Over a Production Year and Their Commodity
Components
|
Animal
|
Typical Ration Specifications
|
Concentrate Presentation
|
|
Class
|
Subclass
|
Overall Specifications
|
Forage Content %
|
Grain Content %
|
TMR
|
Meal-fed1
|
Ground-fed2
|
|
Lamb
|
Up to 65 lbs.
|
Creep/starter
17-18% CP
80-85% TDN
|
0-40
|
100-60
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
|
65 lbs. +
|
Grower/finisher
15-16% CP
78-82% TDN
|
0-30
|
100-70
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
15-16% CP
82+% TDN
|
|
Replace-
ment
|
Ewe lamb
|
14-17% CP
65-68% TDN
|
65
|
35
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
9-14% CP
80+% TDN
|
|
Ram lamb
|
14-17% CP
65-68% TDN |
70
|
30
|
Yes |
Yes
|
9-14% CP
80+% TDN |
|
Ewe
|
Maintenance
|
|
100
|
0
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Flushing
|
10-15% CP
68-70% TDN
|
85
|
15
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
9-13% CP
80+% TDN
|
|
Late gestation*
|
15-18% CP
68-75% TDN
|
85-60
|
15-40
|
Yes
|
*
|
9-14% CP
*
80+% TDN
|
|
Lactation*
|
14-17% CP
70-80% TDN
|
70-50
|
30-50
|
Yes |
*
|
9-14% CP
*
80+% TDN
|
|
Ram
|
Maintenance
|
|
100
|
0
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Conditioning
|
10-15% CP
68-70% TDN
|
85
|
15
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
9-13% CP
80+% TDN
|
|
Breeding
|
10-15% CP
68-70% TDN |
85 |
15 |
Yes |
Yes
|
9-13% CP
80+% TDN |
1 Meal-fed - When grain is fed all at one time in a bunk,
i.e., slug feeding, pail feeding.
2 Ground-fed - When grain is fed all at one time but it is delivered
on the ground.
* Acidosis risk
Table 3.
Commodity Options by Concentrate Feeding System
|
Bunk
|
Pasture and Ground Feeding
|
|
Soybean meal, mineral, whole corn, whole small grains and processed
grains and byproducts
or
Supplement pellets, whole corn, whole small grains
|
Soybean meal pellets, whole corn (whole small grains). Note - free
choice mineral
or
Whole corn (whole small grains). Note - free choice mineral
or
Supplement pellets, whole corn (whole small grains)
|
For more information:
Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300
Local: (519) 826-4047
E-mail: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca
|